AKASH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/2778/2025 · 2025-04-03
Manish Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131671 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131671 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18528 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2778 of 2025 Applicant :- Akash Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Manjusha Kapil Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 971 of 2024, under Section 310(2), 317(3) of B.N.S., 2023 P.S.- Kotwali Sadar, District -Lakhimpur Kheri. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. and his name came into light in the confessional statement of the co-accused. He added that the police has implicated him in the present case only on the basis of suspicion and there is no cogent piece of evidence against him. Further submission is that criminal history of one case against applicant has been explained and he is languishing in jail since 28.12.2024 and in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty and would co-operate in the trial proceedings. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that the applicant is involved in committing the aforesaid offence, as such, he is not entitled to be released on bail. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of record, it transpires that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. and his name came into light in the confessional statement of the co-accused; there is no cogent piece of evidence against him; criminal history of one case against applicant has been explained; the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.12.2024 and he has undertaken that he will not misuse the liberty of bail if granted and would co-operate in the trial proceedings.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment and considering larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail. Let the applicant Akash Verma involved in the aforementioned
crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he/she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him/her under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his/her presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him/her, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court, absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him/her in accordance with law. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench