[2025:RJ-JP:12964] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4863/2010 Badri Lal Son of Shri Govind Narain Soni, aged about 58 years, Resident of 68/376, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Technical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Director, Technical Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer through its Secretary. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Sharma for Mr. Ashok Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Umesh Choudhary for Mr. Vidyadhar Gathala, Addl. GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that controversy involved in this writ petition has already been decided by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal and Others Versus State of Rajasthan and Others while deciding D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4361/2017 on 31.05.2018. 2. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner cannot be considered against the vacancies prior to year 2010, hence under these [2025:RJ-JP:12964] (2 of 2) [CW-4863/2010] circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief from this Court. 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and without going into the merits of the matter, this Court deems it just and proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned along-with copy of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal (supra) by way of filing representation and satisfy the respondents that the issue involved in the instant writ petition is similar and identical to the case of Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal (supra) and the petitioner is entitled to get the similar benefits as granted in the aforementioned case. 4. In case, any such representation is submitted by the petitioner with the respondents within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of three months thereafter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. All applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/128