[2025:JHHC:16802] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4973 of 2025 ------ 1. Chandra Kishor Yadav aged about 40 years S/O Nunulal Mahto R/O Village- Dondiya Piprasole P.O. & P.S.- Sonaraithari District- Deoghar (Jharkhand). 2. Shailesh Yadav @ Shailesh Kumar, aged about 27 Years S/O Chandra Kishor Yadav R/O Village- Dondiya Piprasole P.O. & P.S.- Sonaraithari District- Deoghar (Jharkhand). 3. Pushpa Devi aged about 35 Years W/O Chandra Kishor Yadav R/O Village- Dondiya, Piprasole P.O. & P.S.- Sonaraithari District- Deoghar (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate Mr. Niranjan Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-24-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Sonaraithari P.S. Case No.73 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons have committed the murder of Deepak Kumar, Shivam Kumar and Diwakar Kumar and threw their dead-bodies in a pond to cause disappearance of the evidence of the murder. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are false. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It is then submitted that no witness has been examined in this case although the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the cognizance of the offence has been taken. It is also submitted that because of the fact that the petitioners are litigating terms with the informant; hence, they have falsely been dragged in this case and except for suspicion, there is no other material available in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 20.08.2024 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Deoghar in connection with Sonaraithari P.S. Case No.73 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/