INDU GAUD v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER,FOOD,AYODHYA MANDAL,AYODHYA, AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/3184/2025 · 2025-04-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131647 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131647 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18587 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3184 of 2025 Petitioner :- Indu Gaud Respondent :- Additional Commissioner,Food,Ayodhya Mandal,Ayodhya, And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Srivastava,Mahendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.03.2025, whereby the appeal preferred by the fair price shop license holder, namely, the respondent no.5 was allowed.
3. The contention of the Counsel for the petitioner is that after the cancellation of the license granted to the respondent no.5, a fresh meeting was called, in which, a self help group, namely, Jai Maa Ambey Self Help Group was selected in the open meeting. Subsequently, the petitioner being the President was called upon to fill the requisite form, which was done according to the petitioner.
4. It is further stated that before any allotment order is passed, the appeal preferred by the respondent no.5 against the cancellation order came to be allowed and the license of the respondent no.5 was restored.
5. The present writ petition has been filed by the President in her personal capacity and not as a President of the abovesaid Self Help Group. The petitioner has no right much less a statutory right or constitutional right which can be said to be violated, even otherwise, the said Self Help Group has not been issued any allotment letter and thus, there was no right which was violated. On account of restoration of the license to the respondent no.5 on his appeal being allowed, it cannot be said that any right of the petitioner to be violated.
6. The writ petition is dismissed in view of the abovesaid observations.
7. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Veerendra Kumar Tiwari, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.5. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench