Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131643 (ALL)

BHARAT @ RAM BHARAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/3185/2025 · 2025-04-03

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18570 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3185 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bharat @ Ram Bharat Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Vikram Shahi,Gaurav Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. Present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed by respondent no. 2 dated 22.10.2024 in case no. 2411/2024 (Ram Kripal and Others v. Bharat) by which it has been directed to the both parties to maintain status quo at the disputed land without any reason." On being confronted, after taking note of observation made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mool Chand Yadav & Another vs. Raza Buland Sugar Company Ltd., Rampur and Others, (1982) 3 SCC 484 and the judgment passed by this Court in Writ - C No.5923 of 2021 (Maheshwar Pratap Shahi vs. State of U.P. & 5 Others) and in Writ - A No.3095 of 2022 (Rakesh Rathor vs. Gajanand Maheshwari), learned Counsel for the petitioner says that justice would suffice, if the present petition is disposed of finally without interfering in the order impugned, with direction to the revisional authority to conclude the proceedings within the statutory period i.e. 6 months as indicated Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.-2 to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Case No. 2411/2024 (Ram Kripal and Others v. Bharat) most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the matter, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench