SHYAMATA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/3222/2025 · 2025-04-09
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131633 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131633 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20052-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3222 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shyamata Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner has some dispute with the private opposite parties herein pertaining to land in question. These are not matters to be seen by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the petitioner has any grievance against official opposite parties he can approach the higher authorities apprising them about his grievance which shall be seen or he should seek other remedies as may be prescribed in law, especially as, Shri Shailesh Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has instruction that revenue officials are not interfering in the matter and it is a private dispute between the parties. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench