Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:20864
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3085 of 2025
Manish Kumar Singh, aged about 39 years, son of Ram Lakhan Singh, resident of village Halka, P.O. Halka, P.S.- Hariharganj, District Palamu (Jharkhand)
….........Petitioner
Vrs.
1.State of Jharkhand
2.Deputy Commissioner, Palamu, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamu 3.Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chattarpur, P.O. and P.S. Chattarpur, District- Palamu 4.Superintendent of Police, Palamu, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamu 5.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chattarpur, P.O. and P.S. Chattarpur, District Palamu 6.Officer-in-charge, Hariharganj Police Station, P.O. and P.S. Hariharganj, District Palamu
.......... Respondents
…....
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : A.C. to Mr. Ashok Kr. Yadav, Sr.S.C.-I
02/29.07.2025 The writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
“ For issuance appropriate Writ(s), Rule(s),
Order(s), Direction(s) nature of mandamus commanding upon the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 to ensure to maintain the law and order and restrain the person/persons who were tried to take law in their land and tried to write the name on the gate which is constructed over the PCC Road western side of NH-98 which is go "towards village Satgawan though the villagers want to write the name on the gate as Satgawan Dwar". AND Further prays to restrain the persons who forcefully tried to write the other name over the gate on the some others purpose. AND Further prays to restrain the Former M.L.A. of Hussainabad Constituency namely Kushwaha Sheopujan Mehta who wants to write the name as Ambedkar Dwar and create the hindrance and disturbed the law and order in the locality and tried to take law in his hand.”
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law.
3.
Learned counsel for the State is present and has no objection.
4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty