Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13161 (JHR)

SAGAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4812/2025 · 2025-06-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:16153] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4812 of 2025 ------ Sagar Sharma, Age-33 Years, S/o- Ramesh Sharma, R/o- Village+P.O. Duruwa, P.S.+Dist- Latehar Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-19-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.292 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and his father and mother assaulted Sadakat Ansari by assaulting him with knife and while the petitioner was fleeing away from the place of occurrence, a country-made pistol with four live cartridges was recovered from his possession. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the police recovered one air gun from the house of the petitioner on the basis of his confessional statement. It is then submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.01.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.292 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/