lN THE H[GH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3426 OF 2025 E= Between: Kishore Palaksha Reddy, S/o Palaksha Reddy, Age 32 years, Occ Business, R/o D.No.19/1,3rd Cross Road, 24-Main HSR Layout, Bangalore Karnataka ...Petitioner/Accused No.4 •AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by S.H.O. Yetapaka Police Station Alluri Sitaramaraju District. € ...Respondent/Complainant I petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS (Old Sections 437 & 439 of cr.p.c), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminal Petit'lon, the High Court may be pleased to pass an appropriate o+cil6r enlarging him on Bail, in connection with crime 137/2024 of Yetapaka PS. pending the filing of chargesheet, trial thereof, in the interest of Justice and Equity. CounselforthePetitioner : SriVN S LSasidharV Counsel for the Respondent : Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following ORDER: lIIIllllIIIIIIIr APHCOIO157132025 EFEriE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Origl-hal Jurl-sd,-ction) [3369] / THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO rE>lI`J[ILIJLl h-_._.___ __ Between.I Kl'shore palaksha Reddy AND -I.PETITIONER/ACCUSED The State of Andhra pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the petitioner/accused.I 1.VNS LSASIDHARV counsel for the Respondent/complaI-nant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR I±e_£g±±±±±a±e±!±eJ±!!Qri±ri This criminal PetI-lion, under Sections 480 and 483 of BNSS, has been filed by the petitioner herel-n/A4, seekl-ng regular bal'I, jn crI'me No.137 of 2024 of Yetapaka poll-Ce Station, AIluri sjtharama Raju District, regI-Stered for the offence punishable under sectI'OnS 111(2)(b) and 111(4) of the BNS and sections 20(b)(li)(c) read wI'th 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropjc Substances Act,1985. 2. case of the prosecutl'on, in brief, isthat, on 12.ll.2024, the sub-Inspector of police along w,-th hl-s staff and mediators whI-Ie conducting raid at Bojjaguppa centre, yetapaka, they caught hold of A1, A3 to A6 whI®le they were in possession and transporfatl-on of Ganja of 100Kgs, whJ'Ch Was Supplied by Al and A2 packed jn `of# / E= + rj 5 white color plastic bags by two cars. The contraband along with other material was seized under the cover of mediators report. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that the contraband allegedly involved in the present crime is 100Kgs of Ganja and the same was seized from the possession of petitioner herein and others. lt is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the father of the petitioner has been suffering from ill-health and undergoing treatment in the hospital with heart and kidney problems. ln support of his contention, the learned counsel for the petitioner placed a copy of the medical report. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has not disputed the genuineness of the said medical report. 5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of commercial quantity of ganja in the present crime, petitioner is not entitled bail as prayed for. However, keeping in view of the health condition of the father of the petitioner herein, the Petitioner herein is granted bail for a period of two (o2) weeks i.e. from 24.04.2025 to 08.05.2025 with the following conditions. i. The petitioner herein shall be released on bail on executl'on of personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fl-fly _~y :,jy E To, 3 thousand only) with one surety for II'ke Sum to the satisfaction of the Jail Superl'ntendent concerned. iI-. The petitioner herel|n sha" surrender before the Ja" superintendent concerned on o8.05.2025 by 5.00 p.m. jli. lt is made clear that any extension petl-lion for I'nterjm bail wI'll not be entertaI'ned. iv. ln the event of fat-lure of petitioner surrendering before the Jail Superintendent concerned wl'thl'n the time stl'pulated by this court, the Jail Superintendent concerned js directed to inform the same to the concerned Magistrate and on receipt of the same the learned MagI'Strate I-s directed to I'SSue warrant against the petitioner to procure his presence. 6. Accordingly, the criml-nal petition is disposed of. T-J\J ASSlsTAN S^PL_P ` PRAs'AD |-I-_ RAO Fc /ITRUE COPY// 1. The Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, 1985 Gum 1 St Additional Sessions Judge at Rajamahendravaram. 2. The Superintendent, central prison, RaJ-amahendravaram, East Godavari District. 3. The S.H.O. Yetapaka Police Station, AIluri Sitaramaraju District. 4. One CC to Sri V N S L Sasidhar V, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two cos to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court ofAndhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Onespare copy >ut U) u c-..---,.,-- ~J I HIGH COURT TMR,J DATE D ..17/04/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.3426 of 2O25 DISPOSED OF