Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131583 (ALL)

PARAM SUKH PAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT , LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/3523/2025 · 2025-04-03

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18502 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3523 of 2025 Petitioner :- Param Sukh Pal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development , Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Pandey,Krishna Kumar Singh,Shashwat Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite parties No. 1 & 2. 2. No one has accepted notice for opposite party No.3 i.e. Executive Officer, Nagar, Palika Parishad, Raibareli. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- " issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties, specifically the opposite parties No. 2 & 3 to release the notional increment as per guidelines, issued by the State Government vide notification dated 12.06.2024. " 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for redressal of their grievance, the petitioners have preferred representation dated 01.03.2025 (Annexure No.4) to the competent authority but to no avail. He has further submitted that the petitioners are ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, they may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Executive Officer, Nagar, Palika Parishad, Raibareli and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioners with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioners to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e., the Executive Officer, Nagar, Palika Parishad, Raibareli ventilating their grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with them enclosing therewith the copy of their earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioners forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench