Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131580 (ALL)

SUNEEL v. ANIL KUMAR YADAV AND OTHERS

A227/1834/2025 · 2025-04-03

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18473 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1834 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suneel Respondent :- Anil Kumar Yadav And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushal Kishore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party Nos.12,13 and 14 and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief :- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned court below i.e. opposite party No. 14/Board of Revenue U.P. at Lucknow to decide the case No.Rev/1172/2024/Lucknow, computerized case No. R20241046001172, Suneel Versus Anil Kumar Yadav Ex Panel Lawyer & 12 Others, under section 210 U.P. Revenue Code 2006, expeditiously within the stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice." It is stated that as per para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the revision is pending since April, 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner is suffering great hardship. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.14, i.e Board of Revenue , U.P., Lucknow to decide the Case No.Rev/1172/2024/Lucknow, computerized case No. R20241046001172 (Suneel Versus Anil Kumar Yadav Ex Panel Lawyer & 12 Others), most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench