RAJESH KUMAR PRADHAN AND ANOTHER v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR,LUCKNOW AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/3232/2025 · 2025-04-09
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131575 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131575 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19957-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3232 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Pradhan And Another Respondent :- District Magistrate/Collector,Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard Shri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned additional chief standing counsel for the State. Borrowers have challenged the order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 that too on
23.10.2017. Such a petition at the behest of the petitioners is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India instead the remedy, if at all, was under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The writ petition is misconceived and not maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench