Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13152 (AP)

PALLAPU SRINIVASULU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8136/2025 · 2025-04-03

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010157242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8136/2025 Between: Pallapu Srinivasulu and Others The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the Petitioner 1. Srinivasulu P Counsel for the Respondent 1. GP for Revenue 2. T Venu Gopal SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) 3. GP for Endowments The Court made the following order The present writ petition is filed respondent in not taking action against the encroachers i.e., the 5 respondent from unauthorized occupation of the Srisaila Kshetra Vadiyarajula Satram IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8136/2025 Pallapu Srinivasulu and Others AND f Andhra Pradesh and others ... Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the Respondents: SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) for Endowments The Court made the following order: writ petition is filed challenging the in taking action against the encroachers i.e., the 5 respondent from unauthorized occupation of the premises of Akhila Bharatha Srisaila Kshetra Vadiyarajula Satram, Srisailam. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...Petitioners ...Respondents SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) inaction of the taking action against the encroachers i.e., the 5th and 6th Akhila Bharatha 2. Heard Sri P.Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.Venu Gopal, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments. With the consent of both the learned counsel the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for admission, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments, has placed on record a copy of the written instructions received from the 4th respondent, dated 02.04.2025. A perusal of the same would reflect that their office has received multiple complaints against the Akhila Bharatha Srisaila Kshetra Vadiyarajula Satram, Srisailam, regarding mismanagement, non production of accounts, and non-conduct of annual audits. An inquiry was initiated, and notices were issued to the Committee to attend for inquiry on 07.01.2025 and 17.01.2025, with relevant records. 4. However, the Committee has requested to reschedule the inquiry to 05.02.2025, on account of sickness of the Chairman and the enquiry could not be concluded. 5. The written instructions of the 4th respondent, dated 02.04.2025 are placed on record. 6. Having regard to the same, since the inquiry has already been initiated, this Court does not deem it fit to issue a writ to the respondents. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the inquiry within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. Needless to observe, sufficient opportunity for hearing must to the petitioner. No costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. __________________________________ SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 03.04.2025 BSK 56 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8136 of 2025 Date: 03.04.2025 BSK