ABAHY RATN SINGH @ BHONDU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/3073/2025 · 2025-04-10
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131505 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131505 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20285 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3073 of 2025 Applicant :- Abahy Ratn Singh @ Bhondu Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Chauhan,Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. In the light of proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 2 is dispensed with. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2961 of 2022 - Vishwanath Vs. Bhondu Singh, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(Da) & (Dha) of SC/ST Act, Police Station - Bakshi Ka Talab, District - Lucknow pending before the Court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Lucknow and further prayer has been made to quash the summoning order dated 11.07.2023, passed in the aforesaid case. 3. Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing the matter at some length, submits that grievance of applicant shall be substantially redressed in case applicant is granted liberty to file a bail application before the Court concerned, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in
"Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021". 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to the Court concerned to consider and decide the applicant's application for bail in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the trial Court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). 6. It is further provided that in case, in the meanwhile, any coercive process has been issued against the applicant, same shall be kept in abeyance for the aforesaid period to enable the
applicant to appear before the trial Court, in the light of aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court. 7. The application is accordingly disposed of.
Order Date :- 10.4.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench