Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131470 (ALL)

CHANDRA PRAKASH @ OM PRAKASH YADAV v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND 17 OTHERS

A227/1799/2025 · 2025-04-02

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18273 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1799 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash @ Om Prakash Yadav Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And 17 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pooja Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner says that Gram Sabha concerned is left to be impleaded in this petition, as such, he may be permitted to implead the said party during the course of the day. The prayer aforesaid is acceded, as the same has not been opposed. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the aforesaid party in the memo of this petition during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "(i) Direct the opposite party No. 1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No. 65/2024, "Dayaram Vs. Ranjeet and others" under section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed by the opposite party No. 3 against the petitioner and fifteen others which is still pending before the him since 04.01.2024, in circumstances of the case." Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided preferably within six months, however, in the instant case, the appeal is pending since January, 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Appeal No. 65/2024 (Dayaram Vs. Ranjeet and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench