Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131464 (ALL)

VIKAS YADAV AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. MINISTRY OF HOME AND ANOTHER

A482/3179/2025 · 2025-04-15

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21077 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3179 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikas Yadav And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Ministry Of Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shravan Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Sri Randhir Singh, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2 today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Randhir Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed by the applicants for quashing the charge sheet dated 04.03.2022 arising out of Case Crime No.0273 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Para, District Lucknow. 4. It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the respondent no.2 lodged an F.I.R. against the applicants which was registered as Case Crime No.0273 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Para, District Lucknow. It is contended that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and entered into a compromise, and the applicants filed Application U/S 482 No.713 of 2025 before this Court for quashing the entire proceedings against the applicants on the basis of said compromise, and this Court vide order dated 27.01.2025 disposed off the said application directing the parties to appear before the Court below for verification of the compromise. 5. He submits that in pursuance of the said order, both the parties appeared before the Court below, on which the learned Magistrate verified the compromise deed entered into between the parties vide order dated 10.02.2025, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-4 to the present application. Hence, it is submitted that the proceeding against the applicants be quashed. 6. Sri Randhir Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has admitted the fact of the compromise. 7. Accordingly, the present Application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is disposed off in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. 8. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the proceedings of Criminal Case No.402 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No.0273 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Para, District Lucknow is quashed. Order Date :- 15.4.2025 S.Sharma Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench