Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13143 (UTT)

ANUP KUMAR CHAUDHAY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/2275/2024 · 2025-01-09

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 33 BA1 No. 2275 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. S.R.S. Gill, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. The applicant was granted bail on 09.01.2025. Now a Modification Application No. 1 of 2025 has been filed. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is a man of less resources. There are three cases pending against him. He is not in a position to produce two sureties in each of the case. It is not necessary that there should be separate sureties for separate cases. One person may stood surety in many cases. There is no bar to it. Be it as it may, the instant bail order is modified. Para 7 of the order dated 09.01.2025 shall be read as follows:- “Let the applicant be released on his executing a personal bond and furnishing one reliable surety to the satisfaction of the Court concerned”. A note to this effect may also be made on order dated 09.01.2025. Modification application is allowed accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 12.06.2025 Jitendra