Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131395 (ALL)

NINHKU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/3138/2025 · 2025-04-02

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3138 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ninhku Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Vikram,Manas Kumar,Vishva Nath Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. There is a dispute between the petitioner and his brother (opposite party no.4), both of whom were granted patta in respect of the same land. We cannot adjudicate such matters in writ jurisdiction specially as there is no unimpeachable proof that the police authorities facilitated the alleged encroachment by opposite party no.4 upon the petitioner. 3. The petitioner may avail other remedies as may be permissible in law, uninfluenced by this order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Ajit Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench