Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131370 (ALL)

SADIK ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES,LKO. AND ANOTHER

CMRA/31/2025 · 2025-04-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18871 Court No. - 6 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 31 of 2025 Applicant :- Sadik Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Food And Civil Supplies,Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satish Kumar Sharma Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the record. 2. An application for review has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated 17.03.2025. 3. The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that no opportunity of hearing was granted prior to passing of the suspension order, which fact was specifically stated but not considered while passing the order. Reliance is placed upon the judgment of this Court in Writ C No. 10388 of 2024 (Jabir Ali Vs. State of U.P. and another). 4. Considering the fact that by means of the judgment sought to be reviewed, directions were given to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority for preferring an appeal. No reason exists for review of the said judgment. The judgment relied upon in the case of Jabir Ali (Supra) would have no consequences wherein this Court had observed the right of hearing is must. 5. Considering the fact that all these issues including the non-grant of right of hearing can be considered before the appellate authority also, I do not see reason to review the order dated 17.03.2025. The application is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench