THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR v. G UMA MAHESWARA RAO
LAAS/29/2021 · 2025-08-27
Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13137 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13137 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010157252021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.29 OF 2021 Between: The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, S.R.B.C., Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Petitioner
AND Guduru Uma Maheswara Rao, S/o Subbanna, R/o.Giddaluru Village, Sanjamala Mandal, Kurnool District ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : The G.P. for Appeals Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. K.Rathanga Pani Reddy
The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble NJS,J)
Heard Mr.S.Bala Mohan, learned Government Pleader representing the appellant. Also heard Mr.S.Chandra Sekhara Reddy,
learned counsel representing the respondent/claimant.
2. Aggrieved by the orders dated 07.12.2017 in L.A.O.P. No.2 of 2013 on the file of the Court of III Additional District Judge, Nandyal, the State preferred the present appeal.
3. For excavation of Owk Reservoir Complex Stage–II of Srisailam Right Bank Canal (SRBC) at Cherlopalli, several extents of lands were acquired. As a part of the said Project, a draft notification for acquisition
2 LAAS_29_2021 of an extent of Acs.95.06 cents situated in various survey numbers of Cherlopalli Village belonging to the respondent and others under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act) was issued on
30.11.2004. The land of the respondent to an extent of Acs.4.32 cents in Survey No.355 of Cherlopalli Village of Owk Mandal was acquired. The Land Acquisition Officer, after conducting enquiry, passed Award No.23/2005–’06 on 27.2.2006 fixing the market value @ Rs.46,000/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the fixation of the market value by the Land Acquisition Officer, the respondent/claimant sought enhancement of market value @ Rs.10,00,000/- per acre by filing petition under Section 18 of the Act. Before the Reference Court, the Referring Officer himself was examined as P.W.1 and Ex.A.1 Attested copy of Award No.23/2005- 06 dated 27.2.2006 was marked. On behalf of the respondent/claimant, the claimant himself was examined as R.W.1 and Ex.B.1 Common order in O.P. No.10 of 2007 dated 26.2.2010 was marked. The learned Reference Court after considering the oral and documentary evidence, enhanced the market value of the acquired land @ Rs.3,70,000/- per acre as against Rs.10,00,000/- per acre claimed by the respondent/claimant. The present appeal came to be filed against the said enhancement.
4. Though the learned Government Pleader sought to advance
arguments with reference to the grounds raised in the Memorandum of Appeal, in the light of the decision of this Court dated 18.7.2025 in L.A.A.S. No.623 of 2011 and batch, which was delivered with reference to acquisition of land for the very same project i.e., for excavation of Owk Reservoir Complex Stage–II of SRBC at Cherlopalli Village, the matter need not be dealt with in detail. In respect of acquisition of the land situated in the very same Village i.e., Cherlopalli and for the very same Project, pursuant to Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act dated 24.2.2005, the Land Acquisition Officer passed Award No.25/2005–’06 on
3 LAAS_29_2021 27.2.2006 fixing the market value of the acquired lands as in the present case. Aggrieved by the said fixation, the said owners/claimants sought reference under Section 18 of the Act and the learned Reference Court by common order dated 26.2.2010 fixed the market value @ Rs.3,78,880/- per acre basing on the judgment dated 26.3.2007 in A.S. No.1748 of 2005. The State carried the matter by way of statutory appeals vide L.A.A.S. No.623 of 2011 and batch. Initially the said batch of appeals were allowed by a common order dated 28.4.2016 and the market value was reduced to Rs.2,73,000/- per acre from Rs.3,78,880/- per acre. The respondents/claimants in the said batch of appeals carried the matter to the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.5228–5229 of 2017. However the Hon’ble Apex Court while permitting withdrawal of the said SLPs, granted liberty for filing review petitions.
5. A Coordinate Bench of this Court examined the review petitions in I.A.Nos.1 of 2017 etc., filed pursuant to the said orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and by a common order dated 18.7.2025 allowed the Review Petitions by recalling the common judgment dated 28.4.2016 in L.A.A.S. No.623 of 2011 & batch and thereby confirmed the order of Reference Court enhancing the compensation to Rs.3,78,880/- per acre.
6. In view of the said order, which is applicable to the facts of the case and for the reasons alike, the appeal preferred by the State is liable to be dismissed.
7. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
____________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J August 28, 2025 / vasu