Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13137 (ALL)

MADHU GAUTAM v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/1230/2025 · 2025-02-10

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:19977 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1230 of 2025 Petitioner :- Madhu Gautam Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Sajiwan Mishra,Satyam Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Vaibhav Tripathi Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to continue to pay the family pension to the petitioner in accordance with law ii- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the family pension to the petitioner within effect from 5-2- 2018." It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the competent authority on 21.02.2019 which has remained undiposed of. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner afresh and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that petitioner shall move his representation afresh within 4 weeks before respondent no.6 the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 11.2.2025 S.A. Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad