Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131369 (ALL)

YAUGENDRA NATH PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/1804/2025 · 2025-04-02

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18225 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1804 of 2025 Petitioner :- Yaugendra Nath Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bipin Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Ms. Roli Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Bipin Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "To direct the opposite party no.2 to decide the Suit No. 188/2024- 54042345030081 in under section 9 Ka (2) of Uttar Pradesh Consolidation and Holding Act, filed by the mother of the respondent No. 3 to 5, (Dashrath Dei versus Niyadra) within stipulated time, which is pending before the Consolidation Officer Bikapur, Ayodhya (respondent no.2) contained as ANNEXTURE NO.1 to this petition." Taking note of the submission of learned State counsel that the case(s)/objection(s), in issue, could not be disposed of within reasonable time and the same would now be disposed of most expeditiously on merits and also the period of pendency of the case(s)/objection(s), in issue, as well as that the petitioner is aged about 72 years, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2/Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, Ayodhya to conclude the proceedings of the case, quoted above in prayer clause, within a maximum period of six months after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench