Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18543 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2846 of 2025 Applicant :- Sohel Ahmad @ Suhel Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Narvind Kumar Singh,Preeti Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Narvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. has been filed for the following main relief:- " अततः ममानननीय न्यमायमालय ससे पमाररनमा हहै ककि अपरमाध ससंख्यमा-121/2024 अन्तररत 323, 504, 506, 354 भमा०द०ससं० व आररोप पत्र ससंख्यमा 1 कदनमासंककित 21.04.2024 रमानमा- वजनीररसंज, जजलमा- लखनऊ, मम जलयसे रयसे पससंजमान आदसेश कदनमासंककित - 11.03.2025 सरकिमार - बनमाम - सरोहसेल अहमद, न्यमायमालय शनीममान ए०सनी०जसे०एम० 7 किक्ष ससंख्यमा 31 लखनऊ किसे समक्ष लममबत वमाद ससं 0-30010/2025 मम पचजलत समपपूरर किमायरवमाहनी किरो कनरस्त /खमणण्डित / अपमास्त किरनसे किकी किक पमा किरम। यहमाहाँ यह भनी पमाररनमा हहै ककि यमाचनी किसे कवरूद्ध अपरमाध ससंख्यमा -121/2024 अन्तररत 323, 504, 506, 354 भमा०द०ससं० व आररोप पत्र ससंख्यमा 1 कदनमासंककित 21.04.2024 रमानमा वजनीररसंज, जजलमा- लखनऊ, मम जलयसे रयसे पससंजमान आदसेश कदनमासंककित -11.03.2025 सरकिमार - बनमाम - सरोहसेल अहमद, न्यमायमालय शनीममान ए०सनी०जसे०एम० 7 किक्ष ससंख्यमा 31 लखनऊ किसे समक्ष लममबत वमाद ससं0-30010 / 2025 मम पचजलत किमायरवमाहनी किरो उपररोक यमाकचकिमा किसे लममबत रहनसे किसे ददौरमान स्रकरत ककियसे जमानसे किमा आदसेश पमाररत किरनसे किकी किक पमा किरम।" 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant apply for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 7. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 8. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench