NASREENA BANO v. RAVINDER KUMAR AND ANR. (SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) (SWP/1743/2010)
CCP(S)/59/2021 · 2025-11-03
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13133 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13133 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 57 Regular list IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 59/2021 in[SWP 1743/2010] NASREENA BANO …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Rabinder Singh, Advocate. Vs.
RAVINDER KUMAR AND ANR ...Respondent(s) Through:
Mr. Furqan Sofi, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 03.11.2025
1. Statement of facts/compliance report has been filed.
2. In terms of the judgment passed by this Court, the respondents have considered the case of the petitioner and rejected the claim by passing a
consideration order.
3. In view of the statement of facts/compliance report and the consideration
order passed, the order passed by this Court stands complied with, and the present contempt petition is accordingly closed. Contempt proceedings are dropped.
4. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection order, he shall be at liberty to avail such remedy as may be available to him under law.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 03.11.2025 8Hilal9