[2025:RJ-JP:22939] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4251/2025 1. Rizwan S/o Sahabuddin, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Neemliwas, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (The Accused Petitioner Is At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Taufeek S/o Deen Mohammed, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Neemliwas, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (The Accused Petitioner Is At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Judgment 06/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.55/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan for the offence(s) under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) 308(2), 61(2) of B.N.S and 66(D) of I.T Act. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioners are in judicial custody since 08.03.2025 and conclusion of the trial will take considerable time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:22939] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4251/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, and perused the record as also arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, since petitioners are in judicial custody since 08.03.2025 and conclusion of trial will take time, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioners namely 1. Rizwan S/o Sahabuddin 2. Taufeek S/o Deen Mohammed are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by this court. The petitioners are further directed to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioners by this Court. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J DIKSHA MISHRA /26