APHC010157072013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 31210/2013 Between: 1. NIMMALA SATYAVANI, D/O.NITNRNALA SESHU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. ANKALAGUDEM VILLAGE, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TOBACCO BOARD, REP.BY IT'S CHAIRMAN GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE AUCTION SUPERINTENDENT PRODUCTION, TOBACCO BOARD, KOYYALAGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents herein in refusing to register the Tobacco Barn No. 30-001-005 in favour of the petitioner for the crop year 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 by proceedings bearing F.No. 1(8)C/2012-13/PDN/2446 dated 02-09-2013 which is arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the tobacco Board Act and consequently set aside the same by directing to register the transfer the licence in favour of the petitioner forthwith and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 38763 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to sell the tobacco barn No. 30- 001-005 on behalf of petitioner's father pending disposal of the above writ petition in this Hon'ble Court and pass. IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 171674 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. J V PRASAD The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 04.07.2025 TVN 53 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.31210 OF 2013 Date : 04.07.2025 TVN