Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18621 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1838 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Mishra Respondent :- Vigyan Murari And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheo Prakash Singh,Vikas Dwivedi Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 31.01.2025 whereby the temporary injunction granted to the petitioner was not extended by observing that he has failed to file a reply to the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. 3. The counsel for the petitioner argues that merely because he did not file a reply to the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the non-extension of the temporary injunction was an improper exercise of the power. He, on instructions, states that he is ready and willing to file the objection to the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC within a period of one week. 4. In view of the said statement, the present petition is disposed off with direction that in case, the petitioner files objection to the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC within a period of one week from today i.e. on or before 19.04.2025, the Civil Judge (JD) Lakhimpur Kheri shall pass orders on the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as well as on the application for extension of temporary injunction simultaneously. 5. Till 19.04.2025, the parties shall maintain status-quo in terms of the temporary injunction granted earlier. 6. In case, the objections are not filed, the temporary injunction shall not be extended after 19.04.2025. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench