Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13129 (KAR)

M/S GLOBAL AGENCIES v. THE ASSISTANT COMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT)- 2.2

WP/707/2025 · 2025-01-24

S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3168 WP No. 707 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.707 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. GLOBAL AGENCIES, A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN REGISTERED UNDER THE GST ACT, 2017, NO.386, GROUND FLOOR, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. (REPRESENTED BY ITS PROP: D. SUNDAR AGED 62 YEARS) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.M. SHIVAYOGISWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT)-2.2., DGSTO-2, PIONEER PLAZA, KENCHANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, NEAR GOPALAN ARCADE, BENGALURU-560 098. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V. SHIVAREDDY, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED EXPARTE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT IN RELATION TO THE TAX PERIOD JULY 2017 TO MARCH 2018 BEARING NO. ACCT(AUDIT)-2.2/OR-74(9)/23-24 DATED 27.02.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3168 WP No. 707 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT ORAL ORDER The petitioner, a proprietorship concern is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash Order bearing No.ACCT(Audit)2.2/OR- 74(9)/23-24 dated 27.02.2024 (Annexure-C) and Endorsement bearing No.ACCT(A-2.2)/T/2024-25 dated 19.12.2024 (Annexure-D), whereunder the Order and Rectification Order are passed under Section 74(9) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'KGST/CGST Act, 2017) read with Rule 142 of Karnataka Goods and Services Tax/Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (for short 'KGST/CGST Rules, 2017) respectively. 2. Heard Sri. K.M.Shivayogiswamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate Sri. V.Shivareddy for the respondent. Perused the writ petition papers. 3. Learned counsel Sri. Shivayogiswamy mainly contends that in pursuance to the show-cause notice issued under Section 74(1) of KGST/CGST Act, 2017, filed his - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3168 WP No. 707 of 2025 objection and while passing order under Section 74(9) of KGST/CGST Act, 2017, the Competent Authority failed to consider the objection of the petitioner. Further, learned counsel referring to Section 75(4) of KGST/CGST Act, 2017, submits that the respondent failed to provide an opportunity to the petitioner. As the objections are not complied and the petitioner had no opportunity of hearing, learned counsel would pray for remanding the matter to the Competent Authority i.e., the respondent. 4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate has filed statement of objection on behalf of the respondent. Paragraph No.12 of the statement of objection reads as follows: "12. It is submitted that the petitioner has submitted in this Writ Petition, that there was no suppression of facts, as the petitioner has declared the details of outward supplies of goods or services by furnishing GSTR-1 it is correct but the outward turnover along with taxes has not discharged within prescribed time limit which is mandatory under GST Act, 2017. However, since the respondent has not considered the reply submitted by the petitioner by oversight & the adjudication order U/s 73 will be passed, if this Hon'ble - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:3168 WP No. 707 of 2025 Court remands matter directing consideration of Petitioner case as per section 75(2) of the GST Act, 2017." 5. The above portion of statement of objection makes it abundantly clear that the respondent while passing the impugned order, has failed to take note of the objections/reply filed by the petitioner. Since the respondent while passing order under Section 74(9) of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 has failed to consider the reply/objections filed by the petitioner, the matter needs to be remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration. Hence, the following: ORDER (a) Writ petition is allowed; (b) Order at Annexure-C bearing No.ACCT(Audit)2.2/OR-74(9)/23-24 dated 27.02.2024 and Endorsement at Annexure-D bearing No.ACCT(A-2.2)/T/2024-25 dated 19.12.2024 are quashed; (c) The matter is remanded to the respondent with a direction to consider and adjudicate the matter - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:3168 WP No. 707 of 2025 under Section 73 of KGST Act, 2017 in terms of Section 75(2) of KGST Act, 2017. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24