Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13129 (HP)

NAG RAJ v. THE HRTC AND OTHERS

CMP/14983/2025 · 2025-07-28

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Nag Raj vs. HRTC and others CMP No. 14983 of 2025 in Exe. Pet. No. 132 of 2025 28.07.2025 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/ petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the non-applicants/ respondents. The Court stands informed that after acknowledging that the petitioner is entitled to the retiral benefits, except for leave encashment, all other payments have been released. Accordingly, as prayed for, these proceedings are closed, but with the observation that leave encashment be also paid to the applicant/petitioner within a period of three months from today. Learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that the petitioner is also entitled to the interest on the delayed payment. In the light of adjudication in the writ petition, no such direction can be issued in these proceedings and the petitioner is at liberty to agitate this issue by way of a fresh petition. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 28, 2025 (narender)