NAKUL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF U.K. DEHRADUN
C482/2276/2022 · 2025-05-09
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13127 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13127 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.2276 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Bhavya Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ankurit David, Advocate for the applicant, through video conferencing.
2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, B.H. for the State.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the matter has rendered infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as such.
4. Accordingly the C482 application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
09.05.2025 SK