Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13127 (CHH)

SUMIT SINGH PARIHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1989/2021 · 2025-03-11

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12025 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1989 of 2021 1 - Sumit Singh Parihar S/o Suman Singh Parihar Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Keshla Post Atariya Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya , Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) / Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Revenue Inspector Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri F.S. Khare, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Shubham Bajpayee, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11.03.2025 SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a perusal of the return filed by the State would submit that demarcation has already been conducted and thus, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. 2. Taking into consideration the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer if the cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi