BAJRANGI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WPIL/298/2025 · 2025-04-04
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131252 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131252 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18886 Court No. - 6 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 298 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bajrangi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Shanker Tewari,Ajay Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel as well as Sri Uma Kant Mishra, who appears for the opposite party no.6 and Sri Ashish Kumar Shukla who appears for the respondents no. 7 and 8.
2. The present PIL has been filed by the petitioner for the following prayer :
"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 2 to 4 for taking appropriate action for removing the encroachment from the Khadanja Road which has been constructed over the Gaon Sabha land i.e. Gata No. 489, 491, 493 and 494Ka situate at Village- Nigoliya, Post- Dhammour, Pargana-Meeranpur, Tehsil - Sadar, District- Sultanpur from the opposite party No. 6 to 8."
3. It has been stated in the writ petition that the petitioner is a social worker and has no personal interest involved in the matter.
4. The counsel for the respondents no. 6 to 8 produces documents to demonstrate that in between the petitioner and the respondents, civil litigation is going on in which, the petitioner is the plaintiff no.3 being suit no.1373 of 2021.
5. Considering the fact that the wrong avermens have been made in the writ petition with regard to pendency of the suit, which has been concealed, the present petition is dismissed with a cost of Rs.2000/- (two thousand) on the petitioner for concealing the material facts and misleading this court.
6. The cost of Rs.2000/- shall be paid by the petitioner to the Sultanpur District Bar Association within a period of two months, failing which the District Magistrate, Sultanpur shall recover the same as arrears of land revenue and shall deposit the same in the District Bar Association. Order Date :- 4.4.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench