Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13124 (UTT)

ALLAHABAD BANK v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (SDM)/ASSISTANT COLLECTOR

WPMS/3519/2018 · 2025-02-28

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1399 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 3519 of 2018 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has now rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the statement as given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 28.02.2025 PR 2025:UHC:1399