ALLAHABAD BANK v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (SDM)/ASSISTANT COLLECTOR
WPMS/3519/2018 · 2025-02-28
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13124 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13124 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:1399 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No. 3519 of 2018
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has now rendered infructuous.
4. In view of the statement as given by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 28.02.2025
PR
2025:UHC:1399