2025:HHC:22771 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 568 of 2024 Decided on: 15.07.2025 Kumari Priyanka and another … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General for respondent No. 1. : Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI through VC. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought execution of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 5386 of 2014, titled as Kumari Priyanka and others vs. State of H.P. and others, decided on 30.04.2019. The main writ petition was disposed of by this Court in the following terms:- “4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with the direction that except the post of Art & Craft Teacher, the petitioners, who are manning other posts, shall be allowed to continue to serve against the said posts till the same are filled up by the respondents on regular basis. It goes without saying that the petitioners shall also be at liberty to participate in the process of recruitment to the posts in issue and the respondent may take no consideration the factum of their experience in the School 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:22771 concerned while filling up the said posts. As far as the post of Art & Craft Teacher which presently is being manned by petitioner No. 2 is concerned. learned Senior Panel Counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3 submits that as this post caters to Vocational Training, the respondents do not intend to fill up the same on regular basis, however, the post will be continued till there are students, who opt for the said vocational course. His statement is taken on record. It is directed that petitioner No. 2 shall be permitted to continue to serve against the post of Art & Craft Teacher as long as students are there opting the said course. This, however, will not preclude the State from taking any Policy decision, as prayed for, with regard to the post of Art and Craft Teacher in future The Court has been informed that petitioner No. 4 has already left the job. Therefore, the order passed hereinabove shall only govern the services of petitioners No. 1 to 3. 2. During the pendency of these proceedings, the petitioner has been re-engaged to impart education in the same subject, though on outsource basis. Therefore, this execution petition is closed with the observation that till the eventuality, as is stated in para-4 of the judgment, does not arise, services of the petitioner shall be allowed to continue, be it on outsource basis or otherwise. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 15, 2025 (narender)