- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12274 CRL.A No. 64 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMESH GOKHALE AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O SRI. RAMACHANDRA BHAT DOOR NO.1/28 NARKAT HOUSE MIYAR VILOLAGE DURGA POST-576117 KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTIRCT. 2. SRI. KRISHNA S. LONDHE AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O SRI SEETHARAM BHAT LONDHE DOOR NO.1/9 NARKAT HOUSE MIYAR VILLAGE DURGA POST-576117 KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH KARKALA TOWN POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC STATION HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12274 CRL.A No. 64 of 2025 2. SRI. HARISH S/O ANNI AGED ABOUT 35 YERAS NEAR NARKATTA, DURGA POST MIYYAR VILLAGE-574104 KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A) (2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 IN CRL.MISC.NO.377/2024 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI AND TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE APPELLANTS WITH A DIRECTION TO THE POLICE TO RELEASE THEM IN THE EVENT OF ARREST IN CR.NO.190/2024 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 352, 351, 115(2) OF BNS R/W. SECTION 3(1)(r)(s), 3(1)(g), 3(2)(v-a) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT, 1989 ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI REGISTERED BY THE KARKALA TOWN POLICE STATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant files memo stating that proceedings against the petitioner is stayed in W.P.No.1376/2025 and memo is taken on record. In view of the order passed by this Court the appeal become infructuous. The learned counsel for the appellant is given - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12274 CRL.A No. 64 of 2025 liberty to approach the Court if need arise. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26