Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13119 (KAR)

SRI SURYA CHANDRA RAJU P v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/616/2025 · 2025-04-22

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16665 WP No. 616 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 616 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SURYA CHANDRA RAJU .P S/O PICHAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO. 93/A, 4TH MAIN 7TH CROSS, LAKSHMIDEVAMA BLOCK GANGENAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT K G ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. MANJUNATH, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16665 WP No. 616 of 2025 THE PETITIONER'S LAND BEARING SY.NO. 89/6 MEASURING 09 GUNTAS SITUATED AT KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YALAHANKA TALUK HAVE BEEN DEEMED TO BE CONVERTED FROM AGRICULTURE TO NON-AGRICULTURE BY OPERATION OF SECTION 95(2) (ii) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this writ petition is to issue a direction to the respondents to declare that the petitioner’s land bearing Sy.No.89/6 measuring 09 guntas, vide application dated 12.03.2024 which had been made for conversion, is deemed to have been granted. 2. The learned Additional Government Advocate produces an endorsement whereby it is stated that the application of the petitioner dated 12.03.2024 seeking for conversion has been rejected. 3. In view of the above, it is obvious that the prayer in this writ petition do not survive for consideration. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16665 WP No. 616 of 2025 The writ petition is therefore dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. Liberty is however reserved to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement by which the petitioner’s request for conversion has been rejected. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, the pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75