Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131144 (ALL)

PRABHAWATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,REVENUE,CIVIL SECRETARIAT,LUCKNOW AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/3127/2025 · 2025-04-04

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18747-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3127 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prabhawati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Principal Secretary,Revenue,Civil Secretariat,Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rudra Pratap Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gopal Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. Learned Counsel for the Bank says that apart from the fact that the sale notice cannot be challenged before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the sale did not fructify, and now, fresh sale is needed to be held. If it is so, then, the Bank should mention the correct house number. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench