AFZAL ANSARI ALIAS APHJAL ANSARI v. THA STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4097/2025 · 2025-06-13
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13113 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13113 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:15513] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4097 of 2025
------ Afzal Ansari @ Aphjal Ansari, aged about 26 years, son of Sikandar Ansari, resident of Village- Tulsidabar, P.O. & P.S.- Chitra, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-13-06-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chitra P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of the B.N.S, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and looted Rs.50,000/- and Rs.14,000/- was recovered from the possession of the wife of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner was not known to the informant prior to the occurrence and without putting him under T.I. Parade, charge- sheet has been submitted against him. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.01.2025 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not will annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Madhupur in connection with Chitra P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not will annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/