Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 131118 (ALL)

PRAVEEN KUMAR SINGH v. VICE CHANCELLOR LKO. UNIVERSITY LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/3447/2025 · 2025-04-02

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18389 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3447 of 2025 Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Singh Respondent :- Vice Chancellor Lko. University Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Pratap Singh Yadav,Brij Mohan Gupta,Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Savitra Vardhan Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that appropriate decision may be taken by the Registrar, Lucknow University, Lucknow, who has not been impleaded in the array of the opposite parties. Therefore, he may be permitted to implead the Registrar, Lucknow University, Lucknow as opposite party no.4 during the course of the day. 2. Considering the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, he is permitted to implead the Registrar, Lucknow University, Lucknow as opposite party no.4 during the course of the day. 3. Heard Shri Virendra Pratap Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Savitra Vardhan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 4. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus thereby directing the Opp. Party No. 2 to regularize the service of the petitioner on the vacant post of Homeopathic Doctor. ii. A writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus thereby directing the Opp. Party No.1 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner by reasoned and speaking order forthwith. iii. Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner." 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance the petitioner has preferred representation dated 18.02.2025 to the opposite party No.1, which has been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the petition, but no appropriate decision has been taken on the same till date. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the newly impleaded opposite party No.4 i.e. the Registrar, Lucknow University, Lucknow and the direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 7. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 8. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the newly impleaded opposite party No.2 i.e. the Registrar, Lucknow University, Lucknow taking all the pleas and grounds, which are available to him for disposal of the representation annexing therewith copy of the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition, preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified/computerized copy of this order along with representation. The decision, so taken on the representation of the petitioner, be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench