Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13110 (PNJ)

ASHIN KHAN AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CRWP/388/2025 · 2025-01-16

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN 111 Ashin Khan State of Har CORAM: PRESENT: SANJAY V Constitution No.2 & 3, t have marrie 2. Ashin Khan solemnized members, a petitioners f It has been in the matri protection in instant petit (Annexure IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG Khan and another Versus Haryana and others AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA ENT: Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for the petitioners. AY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition titution of India, is for issuance of d & 3, to provide protection of lives an married against the wishes of private re Learned counsel for the petition Khan, aged 23 years and petitioner N nized marriage on 22.12.2024, aga ers, arrayed as respondents No.4 to oners further submits that it is the first been submitted that the private respon matrimonial life of the petitioners. H ction in that regard and have approach t petition. They have also submitted a exure P-4), to respondent No.2–Co F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-388-2025(O&M Decided on : 16.01.202 . . . Petitione ersus . . . Responden E SANJAY VASHISTH **** etition filed under Article 226 of th e of directions to official responden ives and liberty of the petitioners, wh ivate respondents. petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 oner No.2–Shahin aged 22 years, hav , against the wishes of their fami o.4 to 14. Learned counsel for th he first marriage of both the petitioner respondents are threatening to interfe ers. Hence, the petitioners are seekin proached this Court by way of filing th itted a representation dated 31.12.202 Commissioner of Police, Distri O&M) 01.2025 titioners ondents of the ondents rs, who r No.1– rs, have family for the itioners. interfere seeking iling the 12.2024 District RASHMI 2025.01.16 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-388 Gurugram, H 3. 4. accepts noti learned Stat 5. have been a representati solemnized Accor respondent look into th perception, accordance not jeopardi 6. have taken criminal act law. January 16 Rashmi Whether spea Whether Repo 388-2025 gram, Haryana, wherein, they have exp Notice of motion to respondent On advance notice, Mr. Kanwa ts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 Let requisite copies of the com State counsel during course of the d Since, no photographs of perfo been appended with the petition, the a sentation, would satisfy itself regar nized between both of the petitioners. Accordingly, the present petition is ndent No.2– Commissioner of Police into the representation dated 31.12.2 ption, and if there is any substance dance with law, to ensure that the live opardized at the hands of the private re However, this direction will n taken place between the parties and w nal action, which could be initiated i 16, 2025 speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Reportable: Yes/No - 2 - ave expressed their apprehension. ndents No.1 to 3 only. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryan ts No.1 to 3 (State). he complete paper book be supplied f the day. f performing of Nikah of the petitione the authorities, before entertaining th regarding factum of marriage bei oners. ion is disposed of with a direction Police, District Gurugram, Haryana .12.2024 (Annexure P-4), qua thre stance in it, take necessary steps, e lives and liberty of the petitioners a ivate respondents. will not validate the marriage said and will have no effect on any civil o iated in the matter in accordance wi (SANJAY VASHISTH JUDGE aryana, plied to titioners ning the e being ction to ryana to reat teps, in ners are said to civil or ce with ISTH) RASHMI 2025.01.16 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document