SANJAY HANSDA ALIAS JANJEET HANSDA ALIAS SANJIT HANSADA v. THA STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4039/2025 · 2025-06-12
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13110 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13110 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:15276] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4039 of 2025
------ Sanjay Hansda @ Janjeet Hansda @ Sanjit Hansada, aged about 20 years, Son of Fusan Hansda @ Khusan Hansda, resident of Village- Ganjawa Pesara, P.O. & P.S.- Tisri, District- Giridih;
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... …. Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 12-06-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lokainayanpur P.S. Case No.11 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.137 of 2025 (Sessions Trial No.62 of 2025) registered under Section 103 (1) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of his wife by throttling her neck. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that as per the post-mortem report, the cause of the death of the deceased was Asphyxia due to hanging and except the ligature mark on the neck, there was no other injury. It is further submitted that the witnesses have categorically stated that the deceased committed suicide by hanging herself and at the time of occurrence, the petitioner was not in the house. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.10.2024 as is evident from para-01 of
the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Giridih in connection with Lokainayanpur P.S. Case No.11 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.137 of 2025 (Sessions Trial No.62 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/