SAREEF @ MOHAMMAD SAREEF v. NYAYALAY APAR AYUKT, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/1816/2025 · 2025-04-02
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131094 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131094 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18250 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1816 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sareef @ Mohammad Sareef Respondent :- Nyayalay Apar Ayukt, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Nath Mishra,Kaushal Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"i. Issue an order or direction to the Nyayalay Apar Ayukt Ayodhya Mandal- Ayodhya i.e. opposite party No.1 to decide the revision no. 03359/2010 and Computerized Case No. C201004000003359 (Riyaj Vs. Sareef) U/s 219 U.P. Land Revenue Act 1901, pending before him, within stipulated period. Which is containing as Annexure no.1 to this petition." Taking note of para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months, however, in the instant case, the revision is pending since 2010 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, who is aged about 64 years, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Nyayalay Apar Ayukt, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Revision No. 03359/2010, C201004000003359 (Riyaj Vs. Sareef) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench