MOHD. RIYAJ v. ADDIL .COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA REGION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/1800/2025 · 2025-04-02
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18216 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1800 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Riyaj Respondent :- Addil .Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajat Sharma,Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"(1) Issue an order or direction in directing learned opposite party no.1 to decide the application for restoration dated 04/08/2010 filled in Case Bearing Case No. 3063/2010 pending before the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Region Faizabad for disposal. (contained as Annexure No.1). (II) To issue an order or direction directing the opposite party No.1 i.e Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Region Faizabad that after recalling the order dated 04/08/2010 passed in Appeal No. 333/2010 Mohd. Riyaz and others vs Abdul Khalik and Others may kindly be pleased to decide the above noted appeal with in time frame as stipulated by time to the opposite party No.1 (Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Region Faizabad)." Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and period of pendency of the proceedings in issue and that on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Region, Faizabad to conclude the proceedings in issue most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a maximum period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench