RAM KEVAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/3067/2025 · 2025-04-01
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131077 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131077 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18033-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3067 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Keval Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nisha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard Ms. Nisha Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. It is alleged by the petitioner that a 'goolar tree' has fallen on the sahan land of the petitioner thereby obstructing use of the said land by the petitioner and prejudicing his rights.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that requisite permission has been sought from opposite party no. 4 for cutting the said tree and removing it, but, till date no action has been taken.
4. Let the opposite party no. 4 get the facts verified and do the needful as per law but with expedition, say, within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this
order submitted.
5. We have not adjudicated the right or title of any person including the petitioner in respect of the said tree and if there is any dispute in this regard, then, the same can be decided as per law uninfluenced by this order.
6. With the aforesaid observation/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 1.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench