1 2025:CGHC:18257 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4978 of 2017 • Ramesh Kumar Bhimte S/o Late Shri Nanki Lal Bhimte Aged About 63 Years Retired As Assistant Engineer, Office Of The Executive Engineer Water Resource Division No. 2, Water Resources Department Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj C.G. Presectly R/o Ward No. 1 Gandhi Nagar Ratanpur P.S. Ratanpur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Engineer In Chief Water Resources Department Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Executive Engineer Water Resource Division No. 2, Water Resources Department Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 4. Senior Treasury Officer, District Treasury Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. The Accountant General Of Chhattisgarh, Vidhan Sabha Road, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 4 For Respondent No. 5 : : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Additional Advocate General Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.2 This Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay entire retiral dues, gratuity and pension to the petitioner forthwith. 10.3 That, Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay amount of interest at the rate of 9% of entire amount on the reason of delay.' 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit.” 2. It is informed by Mr. R.S. Marhas, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondents No. 1 to 4 and Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 5 that the retiral dues payable to the petitioner have already been paid. 3. Mr. F.S. Khare would endorse the submissions made by Mr. R.S. Marhas and Mr. Rajkumar Gupta. 4. Mr. F.S. Khare would further submit that interest on delayed payment on the amount of leave encashment, family welfare scheme and gratuity has not been paid. 5. With regard to the interest part, the petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation before the State authorities and in turn, the authorities concerned are directed to take appropriate decision on such representation. 6. With the aforesaid direction(s), the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti