JEETENDRA SHUKLA (PERSONNEL NO. 202300481) v. STATE OF U.P THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3433/2025 · 2025-04-01
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17948 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3433 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jeetendra Shukla (Personnel No. 202300481) Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Yadav,Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Chief Standing Counsel counsel for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. The petitioner claims his transfer to District Bhadohi (Mirzapur Zone) on the ground that his wife is also working in the same department at District Bhadohi.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 which may be
directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 1.4.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench