SMT. REENA SRIVASTVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., P.W.D., LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/3281/2025 · 2025-04-05
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19115-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3281 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Reena Srivastva Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., P.W.D., Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Bhatnagar,Shobha Amarnath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Sri Rankaj Kumar Vishwakarma, Advocate has filed impleadment application on behalf of applicant/ opposite party no.5 which is taken on record.
2. Heard.
3. This is a petition by Gram Pradhan albeit through a private counsel which is impermissible in view of Sections 72 and 73 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Such a petition can be filed by a Gram Pradhan through a private counsel only after seeking permission from the Collector which has not been taken in this case. The petition is not maintainable in its present form through a private counsel.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, however, without prejudice to the Gaon Sabha/ Gram Pradhan to initiate proceedings for redressal of the grievance as per law. The application for impleadment is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 5.4.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench