1 2025:CGHC:13555 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 284 of 2025 1 - Santosh Kumar Yadav S/o Late Prabhulal Yadav Aged About 63 Years Sarwakar Of Hanuman Mandir, Bhatagaon Raipur, R/o Purani Basti Gopiya Para, Danteshwari Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Madhusudan Mishra S/o Pandit Rambharosa Mishra, Aged About 65 Years R/o Prayag Kunj Bajrang Chowk Santoshi Nagar, Tikrapara Raipur (C.G.), Presiden Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vasudev Singh Thakur, S/o Manrakhan Singh Thakur- Died During Pendency Of The Main Petition. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Religious Endowment And Public Trust Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector/manager, Publice Trust Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Registrar, Publice Trust, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Superintendent Of Police, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Office-In-Charge, Police Station Purani Basti, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Nanesh Builders, Through Its Director-Surendra Surana, S/o Shri Devraj Singh Surana, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Nanesh Kripa, Civil Lines, Raipur, 8 - Bharat Bhushan S/o Nakchhed Ram Yadav, R/o Gopiya Para, P.S. Purani Basti, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners :- Mrs. Meena Shastri, Advocate For State :- Ms. Nupoor Sonker, P.L. For Respondent No.7:- Ms. Anushka Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 21.03.2025 1. Heard. 2. This MCC is barred by delay of some days. 3. Learned counel for the petitioners submits that she could not appear as the petitioner No. 3 was died and she could not get any instructions, as such, the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 11.09.2024. 4. When the respondents were asked about the delay, they submit that they are not having any objection if the delay is condoned by this Court. 5. Consdiering the facts and circusmtances of the case, the delay in filing the MCC is hereby condoned and MCC application is allowed. WPC No. 107/2012 is restored to its original number. 6. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed and the WPC No. 107/2012 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha