Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13106 (ALL)

SANJAY MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/1490/2025 · 2025-03-02

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29577 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1490 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Narayan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following substantial reliefs: " I) A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to pay the subsistence allowance to the petitioner during the period of suspension from 31.10.2020 to 19.09.2023 (three years). II) A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Fatehpur to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 21.9.2024 within stipulated period." 2. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection in the event representation of petitioner is directed to be decided in accordance with law. 3. In view of the above the petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondent No. 6 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 21.9.2024, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the order to be passed by the respondents must be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad