JAYENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/2762/2025 · 2025-09-26
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 131053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2762 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Pramod Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and perused the material placed on record. Instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 30.06.2024 U/s- 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, arising out of case crime no 151/2024 under section 498-A, 323,504, 506, IPC and 3/4 of D.P. Act P.S-Gazipur, District- Lucknow and impugned summoning order dated 29.08.2024 as well as entire Criminal Case no. 81313/2024.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that vide order dated 16.05.2025, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, wherein, both the parties appeared and they have settled their dispute amicably. He next added that the settlement agreement has also been executed between the parties and all the parties signed over there. Adding his argument he submits that now there is no dispute in between the parties and further criminal proceedings would be futile exercise and amount to harassment of the applicant and thus, submission is that the criminal proceedings against the present applicant may be quashed.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 has also supported the version of learned counsel for the applicants and submits that now there Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jay Prakash Singh, Santosh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pramod Singh, Sandeep Tewari Jayendra Pratap Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
is no grievance remains in between the parties, therefore the criminal proceedings against the present applicants may be dropped.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties, it transpires that there was certain dispute in between the present applicants and opposite party no. 2, thereafter, they sat together and have settled their dispute before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and that too has been reduced in writing as settlement agreement dated 20.08.2025. This Court further noticed the fact that the Mediation Center has also sent its report dated 20.08.2025 whereby it has been reported that Mediation is successful and completed. A copy of the settlement agreement dated 20.08.2025. has also been enclosed along with the report of the Mediator. Resultantly, the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case no. 81313/2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 151/2024 under section 498-A, 323,504, 506, IPC and 3/4 of D.P. Act P.S-Gazipur, District- Lucknow, are hereby quashed. The settlement agreement dated 20.08.2025 shall be the part of this order. The application is allowed accordingly. Consequences to be followed. Consigned to record. September 26, 2025 Mayank A482 No. 2762 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench